Track Peer Review Revisions and Responses with Codex
Turn referee reports or an editor’s letter into a revision tracker and a point-by-point reply in Codex-Author. Separate writing changes, new analyses, and decisions for the author.
中文Install in Codex
Use the full Codex-Author checkout and its project instructions. The publisher describes the project as a work in progress. Use the fictional example to check the workflow.
- Run git clone https://github.com/AnthonyPuggs/codex-author.git. From the checkout, run git checkout --detach 7a8ba90de6c4e49ee0c48b3a5ee4b55ed046a899.
- Keep the full checkout and plugin references. Copy plugins/clo-author/skills/revise into .agents/skills/revise for Codex project discovery.
- Open Codex and read AGENTS.md. Choose the skill via /skills or $revise. Start with a fictional manuscript and reviews, and ask for drafts only.
Example task
Use two fictional comments: explain the units in Figure 2, and add a result by sample subgroup. Draft the tasks and responses without running an analysis.What to check
The tracker contains both comments and their status. Units need clarification, subgroup analysis needs approval, and the draft makes pending work visible.
Original SKILL.md on GitHub · Updated
Frequently asked question
When can I say a requested analysis was completed?
Once the work is complete and you can reference its actual result and manuscript location. Keep proposed analysis marked as pending in the draft.