Synthesize Conflicting Research Evidence with Codex

Build a decision brief from multiple reports, surveys, or interviews. Track which source supports each claim, its limitations, and how conflicting results affect confidence.

中文

Install in Codex

Use Codex with access to a local project. Keep the skill directory and its companion files from the same pinned revision.

Run git clone https://github.com/ClarentCinematics/Codex-Skills-for-Enterprise.git. From the checkout, run git checkout --detach 3598e7788282b6548430aadfcbfcfd7181ebb02a.
Copy the full skills/research-synthesis-brief folder to .agents/skills/research-synthesis-brief in your project, with its companion files.
Open your project in Codex. Select the skill via /skills or $research-synthesis-brief and use the example on this page.

Example task

Use two fictional summaries. In A, 12 of 20 new users prefer a quick walkthrough. In B, 7 of 10 returning users want to skip onboarding. Ask whether everyone should get a mandatory walkthrough.

What to check

Report both groups separately with sample counts. Label a universal walkthrough as unsupported by these inputs and suggest testing by user stage.

Original SKILL.md on GitHub · Updated 2026-11-11

Frequently asked question

Can I pool two sources that disagree?

First compare the participants, tasks, and measurements. These groups answered in different contexts, so separate findings better explain the difference.