Codex InboxBridge Skepticism for Assumption and Evidence Reviews
Pressure-test a proposal for weak premises, missing constraints, tradeoffs, and counterarguments. Identify evidence that would change the decision.
中文Install in Codex
Codex with an InboxBridge or local proposal checkout, candidate options, and known evidence.
- Copy the entire pinned `.codex/skills/inboxbridge-high-skepticism-mode/` directory to `.agents/skills/inboxbridge-high-skepticism-mode/` in the target checkout.
- Open Codex in that checkout and invoke `$inboxbridge-high-skepticism-mode` with the example task and desired output.
Example task
Give `$inboxbridge-high-skepticism-mode` a fictional proposal claiming that five new settings entrypoints increase usage. Ask for evidence gaps and a small experiment.What to check
The review names the most consequential gap, a plausible counterexample, and an observable check.
Original SKILL.md on GitHub · Updated
Frequently asked question
What if there is no clear counterexample?
Record the assumptions reviewed, remaining uncertainty, and the evidence supporting the current judgment.